Wait, so now that Americans need somewhere to go, unlimited and unregulated immigration is the answer?
Hopefully you’ve not made any jokes about immigrants. Like… ever.
I mean that’s completely possible, I just hope you haven’t.
Wait, so now that Americans need somewhere to go, unlimited and unregulated immigration is the answer?
Hopefully you’ve not made any jokes about immigrants. Like… ever.
I mean that’s completely possible, I just hope you haven’t.
He’s fully aware that he’s a complete fraud.
Correction: an amateurish autocrat.
Properly implemented machine learning, sure.
These dimwits are genuinely just gonna feed everything to a second rate LLM and treat the output as the word of God.
No shit?
Regards
The rest of the world
You’re basically refusing to take an L that you’ve already taken. Yeah, it’s a cringe expression. So is “cringe”, but times evolve.
As I said, you’ve already “lost”. You can’t address the topic, but yet your ego keeps forcing you to come back and reply. I’ve been in threads like these for months. The thing is, I can say whatever and address anything said in the thread, while you can’t.
What’s the definition of “arbitrary” and why do you think timekeeping systems are arbitrary?
So now you’re in the “I’m gonna return every few days, so my profile won’t look as silly when all my childish answers aren’t packed one after another, but spread over weeks”-phase?
Like I said, I’ve genuinely been down this path hundreds of times before, seen your exact “tactic” employed. You have nowhere to go, and you can’t address the topic at all. Check mate. You’ve lost, and now you’re just digging deeper and deeper.
What’s the definition of “arbitrary” and why do you think timekeeping systems are arbitrary?
I want one. Or rather I’m jealous of the specs. But not the OS
You can mix truths in with lies and that would still absolutely be considered dishonest, but you cannot mix lies into truths and still be honest.
Depends on how you look at it. For instance if someone asks about a subjective matter, and you know they’re not asking because they wish to know your opinion about the subject matter, but because they need psychological reassurance or some such thing.
For example “does this make my ass look big”? Or “do I look good in this dress?”
Would you consider a person dishonest for reassuring someone who might have struggled with weight and confidence issues, even if they might not regard that person personally attractive to them?
Is it lying? Perhaps. Is it dishonest? Unless you think there’s some objective standard for what is a big ass and what is good-looking, then it’s gonna be hard to argue either of those are lies, no matter what the scenario. You can also do “well no, that doesn’t make your ass look big, it looks the same size both with and without pants” or “no, that dress doesn’t make you look good, you always look good”.
“Never cruel or cowardly. Always try to be nice, but never fail to be kind.”
I’ve often thought about it.
Generally probably you just slowly learn what not to say or do to not get in trouble and keep your head down and hope you get through it.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOsQDFuB3bqczBIz-a66NvwaOBSyiCo9z
Colditz is a nice show. The Kommandant isn’t a Nazi, but a member of the Reichswehr, and often finds himself in the difficult position of doing the right thing or following orders.
It’s a bit more nuanced than when Finn in the new Star Wars shows changes sides from the empire to the rebels and two seconds later is blasting his former mates accompanied by loud “yee-haas”.
Systematic oppression of the working class
Ah yes “NATO pls if you’ll just surrender and go away, we pinky-promise not be bad anymore”
With Operation Spider’s Web, (and Russia trying to launch massive counterattacks against civilian populations and still only managing to kill only two people) is showing that Russia might not have as strong of a position as they think they do.
C’mon, 2A people. Get your rifles out and take that bad boy down. /s
Also varied tread depth.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Stumble_steps.jpg/500px-Stumble_steps.jpg
We had some stone steps in the yard of a house I grew up in and I could still run those even in the dark, but I’m sure anyone running after me, unfamiliar with the steps would stumble.
I’m just wondering whether the ingenuity was from someone who actually designed them as such, or someone who did a poor job, almost got a bollocking, but then launched into a rant about how it’s actually a defensive feature.
I get your point but also I’m a pedantic Lemming, so I want to point out that in the middle-ages, castle would purposefully build uneven steps. People familiar with the castle would soon get used to them and they’d be no bother, but an attacker running upwards will surely trip. And they’ll trip because of the stairs. Or will it be their own fault for not looking at each individual step to give your body the information it needs?
Just rhetorical exercise, I don’t actually care at all about one side or the other.
(An added stair fact, round staircases would ascend in a clockwise manner, so that right-handed defenders would have the advantage over right-handed attackers whilst fighting in the stairs.)
Ugh, no.
One can’t argue that personality disorders are inherently genetic. You can argue there’s a significant genetic component, but to think that someone is just going to be a narcissist despite how you would rear them is… well, bioessentialism.
Edit oh wait sorry. You asked you didn’t argue. Everyone is born like that, yeah, like everyone is born without object permanence. Then you develop it very early on. Just like you develop a sense of self-criticism as your cognition grows. Some just never do.
I think it’s the noise more than the visual, tbh.
So any sort of high toned buzzing will do.
Someone fires up a weed whacker?
I still remember some of the channels used. Vaguely, but still. News, which time a program is on, and when you’re alone in the room, checking out the naughty adverts, as there might even be rudimentary boob graphics in the style of old Nokia logos.
I’d argue the genie wants to do everything I wish, regardless of the amount of individual wishes.
Oh shit, you actually got me there. As I forgot you can joke about anything, as long as it is a good joke and not actually advocating for a bad thing. It’s just that most “jokes” you hear about immigrants aren’t actually jokes but poorly disguised shitty ideology, so I was thinking of a slightly different context perhaps.