Probably just autocorrect, but *fourth.

The right, or wrong depending on your perspective, people are making money off it.

I didn’t know there was enough oxygen to survive in Trump’s ass.

Probably not far off. Not directly of course, but indirectly.

On the one hand, it would be hilarious for her to receive money from that fund. On the other, I’m still horrified that the fund exists.

Wonder how much I could have made betting against this deal happening, cause it was obviously not going to happen. I don’t even know what it’ll take to end this war/skirmish/military operation/whatever, but I know Trump ain’t voluntarily ending it if it makes him look bad.

He does not wait for Tuesdays to taco.

I know, but it’s still funny.

As a non-aussie reading this sentence:

I was a bit surprised they had data to be stolen. I didn’t think anyone got their phone.

Depends on how the site implements things. Age verification can be regardless of region, or it can just be for specific regions. This holds true for pretty much any feature.

Donatos?

I wouldn’t, though I’m not sure what proof you’re talking about in this specific instance, but I’m not the one that needs convincing. It’s like the boy who cried wolf. If someone reads articles, or only hears from friend or peers, about a person who all turn out to be untrue, why would they believe an article that actually is true?

The credibility of any articles about what Trump has actually done.

He’s already done enough documented horrible shit. There’s no need to add perceived or assumed horrible shit on top. It hurts credibility if it turns out to be false.

Gonna need a citation on the fucking his own daughter claim. Only thing I remember is his creepy comment about how beautiful she is and how he would have sex with her, not that he has/did.

I’m hoping that he won’t be the candidate. He might be better than a Republican, but that’s the only positive thing I can think of. There are so many better Democratic prospects.